Xiomára Gonzales nackt sorted by
relevance

Admin19.08.2021

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. XIOMARA GONZALES :: 2015 :: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

At this point, Detective Samis believed that the two blue bags in defendant s Camry contained narcotics, based on the wire intercepts and the surveillance.
7007
Admin02.08.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

The State urges this Court to align our state-law constitutional jurisprudence with Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, in particular Horton v.
3901
Admin05.09.2021

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. XIOMARA GONZALES :: 2015 :: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

"It is to prevent the police from engaging in planned warrantless searches, where they know in advance the location of certain evidence and intend to seize it, relying on the 'plain view' exception as a pretext.
1506
Admin15.07.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

In light of our disposition in this matter, we need not address defendant's sentencing argument.
8501
Admin12.08.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

Samis and Bonanno then got in the Camry and drove the car, followed by Crowe, to a garage operated by the DEA in Newark.
3102
Admin30.07.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

8 As Justice Stevens noted in Horton, supra, an officer with probable cause that an incriminating item is likely to be found during a search will have no reason purposely to withhold that information in a warrant application.
Admin02.08.2021

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. XIOMARA GONZALES :: 2015 :: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

We agree with the reasoning of Justice Stevens in Horton, supra, that faithful adherence to the dictates of the warrant requirement and to the limiting principles in the well-delineated exceptions to the warrant requirement will better advance the twin goals of evenhanded law enforcement and protecting the individual against unreasonable searches and seizures.
507
Admin04.09.2021

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. XIOMARA GONZALES :: 2015 :: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

A criminal records check of the defendant revealed an outstanding arrest warrant for contempt of court.
4010
Admin03.09.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

New Hampshire, , 91 S.
4807
Admin15.07.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

Judge Perri presided over a three-day suppression hearing, during which four witnesses testified.
4202
Admin15.07.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

The Court stated, "[w]e conclude that whatever remains of the 'inadvertence' requirement of plain view since Horton was satisfied in this case because the police officers did not know in advance that evidence would be found in a hole beside one of several posts on the porch.
36010
Admin01.09.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

Law enforcement authorities secured from New Hampshire s Attorney General a warrant to search Coolidge s Pontiac automobile, which was believed to have played a role in the victim s disappearance.
5404